"No return" to what? A ghostly excellence of relations between the European Union and the Russia? The last Western to have really searched for State Chief to bring the Russia into the European family after his Soviet glaciation period is FranÃ§ois Mitterrand. It was with his idea of European Trade Union Confederation, who received a warm hospitality, both on the part of the German Chancellor Kohl in the year 1990, that of Czech president Havel. But this reasonable project was the following year subject to a job of undermining of the United States, angry to be not related. He collapsed, to be replaced by a strategic triangle, dominated by Washington. First point of the triangle: the expansion of the role of the Organization for security and cooperation in Europe, which the United States and the Canada are founding members. Second point: the revitalization, through the Yugoslav, NATO wars (military organization sitting in the heart of Europe and commanded by an American general). Third point: fast accession to the EU and NATO to all former European satellites of Moscow. The France is sidelined. It buries its idea of a European Europe "from the Atlantic to the Urals. It begins to build a U.S. Europe, intended to extend the Potomac to the quiet Don. Everything works perfectly, first with Gorbachev the dreamer, then with Yeltsin the drunk. For the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Germany to the East, Chancellor Kohl and president George H Bush would, at the beginning of the year 1990, was ready to give the Russia a guarantee of non-eastern extension of NATO, but Gorbachev neglects to ask. In 1999, Yeltsin, comfortable by a special loan from the IMF, agrees that NATO make, without authorization from the United Nations, war to the Serbs, to compel them to abandon their historic province of Kosovo, plagued by an insurgency ethnic Albanian separatist. But the emergence in 2000 of a new tsar in the Kremlin, which is neither low nor alcoholic, will change the situation. That Putin is not anti-Western initially. He agreed to help the United States to fight the Afghan Taliban after the attacks of September 11. But this cold geopolitician will stiffen when America, under the guise of democracy assistance, begins to encroach on what he regarded as an area of ancestral influence of the Russia. For him, it is out of the question to see NATO to settle on the banks of the Dnieper or the foothills of the Caucasus. It’s not going to shout to use international law, because he thinks that it is a legal framework that the large countries impose on small, without never to submit themselves. It will take action, trying to make it the more clandestine possible. With Putin, we are witnessing the comeback of relations force in Europe. New from Ukrainian leaders of the pro-European revolution of Maidan played two huge blasts of poker. February 21, 2014, they flouted the compromise agreement they had signed themselves and which had been initialled by the Envoy of Putin. At the beginning of the summer, they sent their armoured vehicles against the separatist Russian-speaking East of the country, rather than accept the federalization plan proposed by them Lavrov. Those two shots of poker, they have lost them. The Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs do so gave them only one option in his statement of Monday, September 1: accept an immediate ceasefire and the opening of negotiations with the rebels, leading to extensive autonomy of Eastern regions. Otherwise? In good strategists, the Russians carefully hide their intentions. But everyone knows that they have the room for manoeuvre: they can continue their advance towards Crimea, the peninsula is more cut from his ‘motherland’ Russian. They may even go up to Odessa, and operate their junction with their 14th army, based in Transnistria. They know that the West will never launch a war for control of the north shore of the Black Sea. .
Related info can be read visiting web site.