FIGAROVOX/analysis – For its "Operation Ramadan", the Lebanese editor Albouraq puts on sale in 1000 stores in France of books advocating Jihad and the death of the ‘heretics ‘. Decryption of the islamologist Claude Sicard. "The way of the Muslim or"gardens of the Saints"who advocate Jihad and the death of the ‘heretics’ are available in supermarkets." These books are faithful to the Quran or do they give an interpretation perverted Islam? Are violence and Jihad intrinsic to islam? The attitude towards unbelievers: "O you who believe, fight those of your neighbors who are infidels" (9,123); or even: "Kill the polytheists wherever where you find" (9.25); and also: ‘ O Prophet, encourages the believers to fight: twenty brave of them terrasseront 200 infidels ‘ (8.65), etc. With, to exonerate turning believers who would come to kill infidels and that Ã©mouvraient, this soorah who tells them: ‘ this is not you who have killed, it is GodÂ» (8.17). Generally, it must be in memory this Sura where it says: "Muhammad is the Messenger of God. His companions are hard against the infidels and merciful among themselves. In a society as understood islam, should know that there is place for believers. Each are on the right track (the Muslims), other, Â«people of the bookÂ» who wish to remain in error, are admitted: they have the merit of believing in God, and we tolerate so but in making second-class citizens, so-called "dhimmis". These second-class citizens will find themselves constantly harassed in their everyday lives, and the situation will become them finally unbearable. Unbelievers, meanwhile, will be persecuted: they must either convert to islam or be eliminated. And there are actually many of brotherhood between Muslims, but only between them, a Sura saying: ‘ O believers, do you link of friendship between you "(3,118)." Remember also 3.28 Sura which States: ‘that believers do not take their friends among the infidels, instead of the believers. Those who would do so have nothing to expect from God. Of course, found in the Bible of the violent passages. But the fundamental distinction which is between the bible and the Qur’an is found in the fact that the bible was written by men, while the Quran is the word of God by nature. It should be recalled that the Muslims tell us that the message of God issued to men since the dawn of time always was the same: the prophets preceding Muhammad were men "inspired by God" (Moses and Jesus being the two main ones). That they were men, the message that they were granted was imperfect, misunderstood, truncated,. God’s message is finally collected in its entirety by Muhammad who God has dictated his message: therefore the message with which it must comply, because this is the perfect message, and there is more on the other. When we read in the Quran of the passages advocating violence, it is therefore well injunctions issued by the Almighty, messages that cannot be only run if the one is a believer sincere and concerned about his future after the death. The answer to this question is ‘yes ‘. Indeed, the distinction between "radical islam" and "soft islam" is unfounded. It is the effect of the arrangements which our Western societies are trying to find to not condemn Muslims in their refusal to adopt our values and conform to the way we have, we Westerners, to conceive l "Organization of our societies. Democracy and the values on which it is based, is the political system invented by ‘Christians’, a system that Westerners believe themselves entitled to impose today other civilizations. Orthodox islam is one that conforms to the Koran: but the modern Muslim intellectuals are reformers. They refuse to make the Holy Book of islam a "literal" reading, saying we need to "contextualize" the Koran"to remove it from the particular context in which the word of God been issued: it was a Saudi from the seventh century of our era, and the message which then issued is to modernize today ‘ hui in keeping the spirit. This is the position for example of an intellectual as Malek Chebel with his book to great success: "Manifesto for an islam of lights" where this islamologist offers some twenty-seven significant reforms. And it is also the position of Tariq Ramadan, this brilliant intellectual so highly publicized, and unnecessarily demonized, opposed to a literal reading of the Koran. This so listen preacher of young European Muslims wrote for example in his book "islam and the Arab Awakening": "l ‘ islam is at a profound transformation imposed by the historical evolution and the new environment political, economic cultural and more broadly geopoliticalÂ» (page 165). All Muslim intellectuals living in the West are so for a reform of islam as it is clear from the reading of the Holy Book, but unfortunately the crowds are and remain under the tutelage of the imams of the mosques that adhere to this rigorous islam advocated by the Wahhabis and Salafis. The reformers living in the West are intellectuals and their speech is not listened to clerics. With the dissemination of books advocating Jihad and death of heretics on trivializes so radical islam and on bar the way to reformist Muslims that the West would have great interest to support in their fight. The Muslims belong to another civilization than Western civilization. They know that their civilization was stronger than ours in the past, in the middle ages, and were missing their recall also. Subsequently, it is our civilization, with its extraordinary scientific and technical progress which took over. They remind us that we went to dominate for centuries with our techniques and our weapons. But recently they managed a out us of the territories which we had taken them, and with the oil they now have a formidable weapon against us. These peoples who consider that we submitted them, humiliated, pillaged by exploiting our account their wealth, have the feeling that we despise them: they started in the second half of the 20th century to take their revenge, and their resentment towards the West is very strong. Integrate Muslims in a Western society that is based on Christianity is a utopia. Muslims wish to preserve their identity, and we cannot blame them. This is well advised to make a preacher like Tariq Ramadan, a preacher who has the success that we know. It is not so much a matter of religion that a case of identity, and any individual is ready to fight very hard to defend its identity. Including leaving his life if necessary. . You could say in a provocative way that for a Muslim to become a true Westerner, it must be actually convert to Christianity. Certainly, Europeans are agnostic enmajorite, but even this agnosticism is constructed with a culture and Judeo-Christian tradition. Need to understand the problems of integration with the approaches of anthropologists, and not remain on simplistic ideas. The Qur’an says to Christians that they are in error: how therefore Muslims adopt they the theses of these people that the Prophet ordered to fight? The anti Christian message is in the Holy Book of islam: it does not facilitate the integration of Muslims in Western societies, companies based, should not ignore, on values and Christian traditions. .
You must visit the following blog to read more regarding this amazing topic.